Variant Synonymizer: Platform to identify mutations defined in different ways is available now!
Over 2,000 gene–disease validation summaries are now available—no login required!
CACNA2D1 encodes the α2δ-1 auxiliary subunit of the L-type calcium channel critical for channel trafficking and modulation. Brugada syndrome is an autosomal dominant arrhythmia disorder characterized by ST-segment elevation and risk of sudden cardiac death, with a prevalence of approximately 1:2,000 to 1:100,000. Auxiliary subunits like α2δ-1 influence channel kinetics and may contribute to repolarization abnormalities in ventricular myocardium. The gene CACNA2D1 has been proposed as a Brugada syndrome susceptibility locus alongside established genes. However, the clinical validity of this association remains under evaluation.
In a screening of 162 unrelated Brugada syndrome and BrS+short QT probands, four distinct CACNA2D1 missense variants were reported among 16% of cases, including c.2867C>A (p.Ser956Tyr) (PMID:20817017). No familial segregation or de novo occurrences were documented, and affected relatives were not described. Follow-up analysis in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (ESP) identified 272 heterozygous and 2 homozygous carriers of previously BrS-associated CACNA2D1 variants (e.g., c.2126G>A (p.Ser709Asn); c.2751A>T (p.Gln917His)), corresponding to a genotype prevalence of 1:23 in 6,258 individuals (PMID:23414114). Two of these variants (p.Ser709Asn, p.Gln917His) were also prevalent in a Danish control cohort (n=536), undermining disease specificity.
No segregation data or additional affected relatives have been reported for CACNA2D1 variants in Brugada syndrome families, limiting the genetic evidence. Functional assessment studies in murine models and cellular systems have demonstrated that α2δ-1 binds pregabalin in central nervous system regions (PMID:16460711) and that Sp1 regulates CACNA2D1 promoter activity in neuroblastoma cells (PMID:23242029). However, these data do not address cardiac electrophysiology or arrhythmogenesis directly.
Overall, conflicting evidence—case-only variant identification without segregation and high allele frequency in population controls—leads to a disputed clinical validity for CACNA2D1 in Brugada syndrome. At present, CACNA2D1 should not be used in isolation for molecular diagnosis or risk stratification of Brugada syndrome.
Key Take-home: CACNA2D1 variants lack robust genetic and functional confirmation in Brugada syndrome and are prevalent in population cohorts, disputing their pathogenic role.
Gene–Disease AssociationDisputedFour missense variants reported in 162 BrS probands; high carrier frequency in general population controls suggests non-pathogenicity Genetic EvidenceLimitedSingle cohort screening yielded four variants without segregation data; population data show high allele prevalence Functional EvidenceLimitedCNS binding and promoter studies do not address cardiac electrophysiology or pathogenic mechanism in BrS |