Variant Synonymizer: Platform to identify mutations defined in different ways is available now!
Over 2,000 gene–disease validation summaries are now available—no login required!
Although included in RASopathy gene panels, germline NRAS mutations have not been reported in patients with cardiofaciocutaneous (CFC) syndrome. In a comprehensive pathway analysis of five RASopathy patients (including two with CFC syndrome), no pathogenic NRAS variants were identified (PMID:20030748). Likewise, targeted NGS of 80 individuals with suspected RASopathies, encompassing CFC features, did not reveal any NRAS mutations (PMID:24451042). Somatic NRAS missense changes are well‐characterized oncogenic drivers in multiple cancers but lack evidence for haploinsufficiency or dominant‐negative effects relevant to CFC. Overall, the current genetic and experimental data support a Limited association of NRAS with CFC syndrome; additional germline studies in larger, deeply phenotyped cohorts are needed to clarify any contributory role. Key Take‐home: NRAS mutation screening has limited utility in the routine diagnosis of isolated CFC syndrome.
Gene–Disease AssociationLimitedSequencing of five RASopathy patients (including two with CFC) and 80 suspected RASopathy cases failed to identify germline NRAS variants ([PMID:20030748], [PMID:24451042]) Genetic EvidenceLimitedAbsence of NRAS variants in CFC cohorts despite comprehensive gene panel and NGS analysis Functional EvidenceLimitedSomatic NRAS oncogenic mutations in cancer models do not recapitulate CFC developmental phenotype |